多切口拖管术治疗高位马蹄型肛瘘的临床观察
Clinical observation on tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions in the treatment of high horseshoe anal fistula
- 上海中医药大学学报 2021年35卷第5期 页码：32-36
- 作者机构：
1.上海中医药大学附属曙光医院肛肠科（上海 200021）
- 作者简介：
邵雨，女，硕士，住院医师，主要从事中医特色疗法治疗良性肛肠疾病临床研究
郑德，主任医师、教授，博士生导师；E-mail：zd1232@sina.com
- 基金信息：上海市科委科研计划项目(18401905000);国家中医药管理局全国名老中医药专家传承工作室建设项目(2016-167)
DOI：10.16306/j.1008-861x.2021.05.006
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
邵雨, 陆宏, 陈诗雨, 等. 多切口拖管术治疗高位马蹄型肛瘘的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药大学学报, 2021,35(5):32-36.
SHAO Yu, LU Hong, CHEN Shiyu, et al. Clinical observation on tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions in the treatment of high horseshoe anal fistula[J]. Academic Journal of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,35(5):32-36.
邵雨, 陆宏, 陈诗雨, 等. 多切口拖管术治疗高位马蹄型肛瘘的临床观察[J]. 上海中医药大学学报, 2021,35(5):32-36. DOI： 10.16306/j.1008-861x.2021.05.006.
SHAO Yu, LU Hong, CHEN Shiyu, et al. Clinical observation on tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions in the treatment of high horseshoe anal fistula[J]. Academic Journal of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021,35(5):32-36. DOI： 10.16306/j.1008-861x.2021.05.006.
摘要
目的：,2,评价多切口拖管术治疗高位马蹄型肛瘘的临床疗效。,方法：,2,纳入72例高位马蹄型肛瘘患者，随机分为治疗组和对照组，每组各36例。治疗组患者采用多切口拖管术治疗，对照组患者采用传统切开挂线术治疗。比较两组患者的创面愈合时间；术后第3、7、14天，评价两组患者的创面疼痛、渗液、水肿评分；术后3个月，评价并比较两组患者的肛门功能指检、肛门失禁评分及临床疗效。,结果：,2,研究过程中，对照组1例患者脱落，最终治疗组36例、对照组35例患者纳入统计分析。①术后3个月，治疗组的临床总有效率为97.2%，对照组为94.3%，两组临床疗效比较，差异无统计学意义（,P,>,0.05）。②治疗组患者的创面愈合时间较对照组明显缩短（,P,<,0.05）。③术后第7、14天，治疗组患者的创面疼痛、渗液评分均低于对照组（,P,<,0.05，,P,<,0.01）；术后，两组患者的创面水肿评分比较，差异无统计学意义（,P,>,0.05）。④术后3个月，两组患者的肛门功能指检评分比较，差异无统计学意义（,P,>,0.05）；治疗组患者的肛门失禁评分较对照组明显降低（,P,<,0.05）。,结论：,2,与传统切开挂线术相比，多切口拖管术治疗高位马蹄型肛瘘可减轻患者术后并发症、缩短愈合时间、保护肛门括约肌功能，值得在临床推广应用。
Abstract
Objective:,2,To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions in the treatment of high horseshoe anal fistula.,Methods:,2,A total of 72 patients with high horseshoe anal fistula were included and randomly divided into the treatment group and control group, 36 cases in each group.The patients in the treatment group were treated with tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions, and the patients in the control group were treated with traditional incision and thread-drawing therapy.The wound healing time of the two groups was compared.On the 3rd, 7th and 14th days after operation, the scores of wound pain, effusion and edema in the two groups were evaluated.Three months after operation, the scores of anal function and incontinence, and the clinical efficacy were evaluated and compared.,Results:,2,In the course of study, one patient in the control group fell off, finally 36 cases in the treatment group and 35 cases in the control group were included for the statistical analysis.①Three months after operation, the total clinical effective rate was 97.2% in the treatment group and 94.3% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(,P,>,0.05) .②The wound healing time in the treatment group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(,P,<,0.05) .③On the 7th and 14th days after operation, the scores of wound pain and effusion in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group(,P,<,0.05,P,<,0.01) .After operation, there was no statistically significant difference in the score of wound edema between the two groups(,P,>,0.05) .④Three months after operation, there was no statistically significant difference in the score of anal function between the two groups(,P,>,0.05), and the score of anal incontinence in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group(,P,<,0.05) .,Conclusion:,2,Compared with traditional incision and thread-drawing therapy, tube-dragging therapy with multiple incisions can reduce the postoperative complication, shorten the healing time and protect the anal sphincter function in the treatment of high horseshoe anal fistula, which is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.
关键词
高位马蹄型肛瘘多切口拖管术切开挂线术
Keywords
high horseshoe anal fistulatube-dragging therapy with multiple incisionsincision and thread-drawing therapy
references
喻德洪. 现代肛肠外科学[M]. 北京： 人民军医出版社，1997： 218.
王明华，唐海明，陆彩忠，等. 内口切开结合拖线置管引流术治疗低位复杂性肛瘘的临床研究[J]. 中医临床研究，2017，9(35)： 126-128.
郑德，汪庆明，何铮，等. 对口切开旷置结合垫棉法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效评价[J]. 上海中医药杂志，2012，46(5)： 65-67.
国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京： 南京大学出版社，1994.
WHITEFORD M H，KILKENNY J 3RD，HYMAN N，et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano（revised）[J]. Dis Colon Rectum，2005，48(7)： 1337-1342.
上海市卫生局. 上海市中医病证诊疗常规[M]. 2版. 上海： 上海中医药大学出版社，2003： 331-332.
包宗昭，李成林. 临床诊断及疗效判断的四级加权评分法介绍[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学，2000，5(2)： 164-166.
郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则（试行）[M]. 北京： 中国医药科技出版社，2002.
张有生. 肛肠科手册[M]. 沈阳： 辽宁科学技术出版社，2000： 89.
王菁，石荣. 后蹄铁型肛瘘的外科治疗进展[J]. 广州医药，2006，37(1)： 13-15.
占煜，贺小婉，徐红. 复杂性肛瘘治疗的回顾、进展与思考[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志，2017，24(1)： 124-128.
赵航，钱海华. 挂线疗法在高位肛瘘中的应用[J]. 长春中医药大学学报，2009，25(1)： 71-72.
白合提尼沙·阿地力，王环，谭星，等. 切开挂线对口引流术对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后肛门括约肌功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志，2019，28(7)： 776-779.
王猛，王贵玉. 2016年版美国结直肠外科医师学会《肛周脓肿、肛瘘和直肠阴道瘘治疗指南》解读[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2017，37(2)： 162-165.
王静，张海岩，唐诚，等. 杨巍教授治疗复杂性肛瘘学术思想与临证经验[J]. 河北中医，2020，42(6)： 813-817.
关辉，苗红，刘博，等. 腔内超声和磁共振成像在复杂性肛瘘术前诊断中的应用价值对比[J]. 医学食疗与健康，2020，18(4)： 174-175.
郭培培，王业皇. 高位复杂性肛瘘术后不愈合69例原因分析[J]. 临床合理用药杂志，2019，12(32)： 193-194.
0
浏览量
133
下载量
0
CSCD
1
CNKI被引量
- 网络PDF下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies
- 总访问量：10152 今日访问量：15